Peer Review Blog
- Chuhan
- Mar 6, 2018
- 1 min read
For the student one's HCP draft, the author did not clearly show his/her main idea through the title and heading to the audiences. For the body paragraph, the author did not introduce the researcher's information that prove his/her reliability at the beginning of the paragraph. We should put brief introduction at the first sentence. The author also wrote in first person which make audiences feel the essay is not written with a scholarly ethos. In addition, the author used sources from Wikipedia which is not professional sources.
For the student two's HCP draft, the author also did not write a title for his/her essay. Student 2 have the same problem with student 1, both of them did not write down the researcher's information that prove his/her reliability at the beginning of the paragraph.
The author did not write the problem. I think s/he submitted the wrong draft. Moreover,
the citation did not conform to MLA standards.

Form this class, I learned a lot form peer review. After I review other students' essays, I found their problem and connected their problems with my essay. Which make me know what is my problem and improve it. When I got comment from other students, I feel novel because we think in different way. I can learn something from them. I have no confidence in writing essay, but when I saw comments from classmates that telling me I did a great job in some parts, I feel very happy and it also built up my confidence of writing.

Comments